Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 9:26:31 GMT
Another burst of panic and indignation was caused by the statement of the head of Google, Eric Schmidt, who banned "anonymous" people from registering on Google +. The Internet could become much better if users registered on sites and social networks exclusively under their real names. This is roughly the thesis put forward by the executive director of Google Eric Schmidt during a speech at the international television festival in Edinburgh. At least, this is what the current head of Google said by NPR employee and part-time well-known real names. The developers of the fortune-telling machine report. For media advertising with such strange The question of "real names" or Real ID on various sites on the Internet has been raised more than once throughout the history of the Internet.
Google announced a ban google is once again changing its policy so that it is not prevented from built on this Costa Rica Mobile Number List information will depend on this," Kerwin quoted Schmidt on his Google + page. As for those who don't like Google's policy, "no one is forcing them to use Google +." It will be recalled that in mid-August Google announced that it will block the accounts of Google + users who register under fictitious names or impersonate other people. In addition, , which resulted in numerous publications in foreign media. Schmidt's recent performance targeted advertising, personalized search or something else? Such questions are asked by many experts, and some of them note that making money from its services. Of course,
The company is already demanding from people such openness on the Internet, which washusiasm. "Probably Google's analysts calculated all the negative and positive consequences of such a decision," says Iryna Levova, a leading analyst of the Russian Association of Electronic Communications (RAEK). Some users who do not wish to reveal their anonymity will refuse to register. However, the management of the company has the right to its opinion, just as the user has the right to agree with this opinion or refuse the services of the service," she explained to BFM.ru. In the new "social" world, it is necessary to think in a new way According to Iryna Levova, due to the requirement to register under a real name, it is not necessary to talk about depriving the Internet of anonymity in principle. They are not going to check passport data at Google yet, but, nevertheless,
Google announced a ban google is once again changing its policy so that it is not prevented from built on this Costa Rica Mobile Number List information will depend on this," Kerwin quoted Schmidt on his Google + page. As for those who don't like Google's policy, "no one is forcing them to use Google +." It will be recalled that in mid-August Google announced that it will block the accounts of Google + users who register under fictitious names or impersonate other people. In addition, , which resulted in numerous publications in foreign media. Schmidt's recent performance targeted advertising, personalized search or something else? Such questions are asked by many experts, and some of them note that making money from its services. Of course,
The company is already demanding from people such openness on the Internet, which washusiasm. "Probably Google's analysts calculated all the negative and positive consequences of such a decision," says Iryna Levova, a leading analyst of the Russian Association of Electronic Communications (RAEK). Some users who do not wish to reveal their anonymity will refuse to register. However, the management of the company has the right to its opinion, just as the user has the right to agree with this opinion or refuse the services of the service," she explained to BFM.ru. In the new "social" world, it is necessary to think in a new way According to Iryna Levova, due to the requirement to register under a real name, it is not necessary to talk about depriving the Internet of anonymity in principle. They are not going to check passport data at Google yet, but, nevertheless,